[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers

Subject: Re: Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers
From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:25:16 -0500
fop using .fo files
David Tolpin wrote:

Therefore, all tests will be against FO instances. Given this, I can generate some test cases myself, although I will still need to have realistic test cases contributed.

Another normalization is unrolling shorthands, or not using FO files with shorthands
for testing. They are not required for the basic level of conformance, and FOP does
not support them.

Good point. Does anyone have a process that will transform an FO instance to expand shorthands?


Cheers,

Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Innodata Isogen
eliot@xxxxxxxxxx
www.isogen.com


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.