[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: element minimisation (again)

Subject: Re: element minimisation (again)
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:02:32 -0400
aga element
At 09:31 AM 8/12/2003, Mukul wrote:
i agree with David. its not a bug. <node></node> and
<node/> are same according to the spec.

I agree with this, and yet the Andrew is not the only XSLTer who faces requirements for particular syntactic forms in the output serialization, for whatever reason.


In my experience these are best handled in a post-process. If you know which serializer you are using (and processors generally come with their own), this can even be done in XSLT ... making allowance for a couple of little hacks or workarounds, such as comments or PIs (or spaces, as Andrew says) to split open elements you don't want collapsed, etc.

Cheers,
Wendell

--- Andrew Welch <AWelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Someone just asked me why <node/> was coming out of
> the transform as
> <node></node>.  After trying out some of the
> processors, it seems msxml
> x when used with an identity transform doesn't
> minimise.
>
> So, this stylesheet:
>
> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
> xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
> <xsl:template match="@*|node()">
>   <xsl:copy>
>     <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
>   </xsl:copy>
> </xsl:template>
> </xsl:stylesheet>
>
> On this source:
>
> <node/>
>
> Produced:
>
> Msxml3        <node></node>
> Msxml4        <node></node>
> Saxon         <node/>
> Xalan         <node/>
>
> Now the reason this has particularly annoyed me is
> because I've always
> wanted the ability to tell a processor 'don't
> minimise the elements'.
> After a few long dicussions on the list it seemed
> that it wasn't really
> feasible (or there wasn't enough momentum behind it)
> to have a feature
> like this, but obviously that's just down to
> interpretation.  Lots of
> people have had the same issue, and lots of people
> are adding &_#160;'s
> to their output to prevent it.
>
> This just appears to be an MSXML bug, but it
> would've been nice to the
> option.


======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.