[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: which schema validators currently support dangling
I read that same document, a long time ago. Can you include an example of a dangling type for those of us that have forgotten ... Thanks, Rich -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP-Houston) Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:56 PM To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: which schema validators currently support dangling types? does system.xml on the .net platform do it? Hi I came across a best practices whitepaper on xfront.com that suggested "dangling" types as the best way for creating variable content container elements. But of course this article was written in 2001 and it mentions the inadequacy of the validators at the time. I do understand that this might be the wrong place but since this is critical to the application of my stylesheets I am posting a question and if the moderators feel that this is not a valid message please do let me know and feel free to remove it. "Would it be possible for some of the more experienced thinkers out here to give some insights as to which engines currently support dangling types in a schema (XSD) and whether or not .NET system.xml classes would support the same?" I'll appreciate some insight. Thanks. Abhishek Sanwal XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|