Re: identity transform - include CDATA's, etc

> so this would be good if this is the way '<' signs in CDATA sections are
> always handled, and if this behavior is reliable and predictable.  but is
> it, in fact, reliable across the multitude of xslt processors and other
> circumstances?  Is it part of the xslt spec?  I had understood that other
> behaviors similar to this one are not reliable.

In fact, treatment of CDATA is part of the XML specification.  It is reliable
and predictable.

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-cdata-sect

hth,

Mike


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list