Re: Using or ignoring Types in XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0

> 
> This is perhaps not the best example I can 
think of, but it does illustrate
> the point 

I think it was fine enough, in discussions 
of this sort it is often best to have some 
code to see what someone is driving at, 
though pseudocode would have been good 
enough - not that I want to limit your fun. 
I agree we should be able to handle the 
complex types if we're gonna be forced to 
deal with typing at all. 

As an aside: One thing I would want is the 
possibility to pass the appinfo of a complex 
type as a nodeset to my stylesheet. 







 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list