Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript

Play the video

Subject: Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:38:40 -0600

Zack Brown wrote:

On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:54:22PM -0800, W. Eliot Kimber wrote:

Yes--on the EXSLFO list I've discussed several possible low-cost solutions to this limitation,
Do you mean the FOP-dev list or something else? If something else, can
you give subscription information? Google doesn't seem to know about it.

The EXSLFO project mailing list, managed by SourceForge. See exslfo.sourceforge.net.

Cheers,

Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@xxxxxxxxxx
Consultant, ISOGEN International

1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript W. Eliot Kimber - Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:51:52 -0500 (EST) Zack Brown - Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:19:59 -0500 (EST) W. Eliot Kimber - Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:30 -0500 (EST) <= David Tolpin - Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:41 -0500 (EST)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript, Zack Brown	Thread	Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Tolpin
RE: Re: Different Namespace P, Jeffrey Winter	Date	Re: XSL-FO versus PostScript, David Tolpin
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >