[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: How efficient is DVC? - A grouping example

Subject: Re: How efficient is DVC? - A grouping example
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:31:08 GMT
Re:  How efficient is DVC? - A grouping example

> Tree-fragments are heavily used when multiple passes are needed to compute a
> result with only one stylesheet. However, you cannot use the key() function on
> tree-fragments because XSLT doesn't allow you to (there is no nodeset parameter)

To use result tree fragments at all as a node set you need to use an
xx:node-set() extension (as you have done) all implementations of
node-set that I have seen then return a tree rooted at a document
node. Keys may be used with such "temporary documents" just as with any
other node.  key() will index in the document which contains the current
node so so long as the current node is a descendent of the root returned
by xx:node-set($x) the key will work as required.

David

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.