[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xsl:Key

Subject: RE: xsl:Key
From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:32:03 -0000
RE:  xsl:Key
> I have done some tests : Saxon is really faster than Xalan. 
> I know that they are two different tree implementations in 
> Saxon. The use of tinytree seems to decrease the performance 
> whereas results are really "good" with tree implementation.

I'm very interested if you have an example that shows the (full) tree
outperforming the tinytree, because I have had difficulty finding such
examples myself. The tinytree usually wins because it is faster to
build, and uses less memory: in principle the full tree should be faster
if you keep it in memory and use it often enough to pay for the extra
build cost.
> 
> Are Key's implementation different?
> 
No, the key implementation in the two cases is identical.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.