[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: N : M transformation
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:55:09PM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote: I am. (for now, to a draft spec, then, to a rec spec) And chunk your output with an external tool in the meantime. I see no reason for doing this. Any of the methods I used worked fine enough as temporary workarounds, so there's no need for a non-XSLT tool. I used * processor specific extensions * XSLT 1.1 draft syntax Before resorting to a non-XSLT tool, I'd use * XSLT 2.0 draft syntax or * feature detection, including procesor-specific syntax and EXSLT syntax Asking for something with is non-standard is your problem, I think that's relatively clear. I don't really have a problem more than anyone else currently using XSLT for multi-document output. There are various non-standard methods (listed above), all do their job, but can be discussed in a thread such as this here. And multi-document will most likely be "standard" (part of a rec) in the future. Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|