Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

Play the video

Subject: Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:22:30 +0100

Daniel Veillard wrote:

>>"I'm just stating why I think at this point that I won't be able to
>>implement XSLT-2.0 nor XPath-2.0 anytime soon."
>>
>   true, but I didn't tried.
>
>>So is the spec the reason or not? If the reason is only it's reliance
>> on
>>XML Schemas Structure, then that's the issue which should be resolved.
>>
>   the reliance on XML Schemas, independantly of the lack of time, is
> in my current view the main factor. On the other hand I understand the
> value of being able to select based on types.

So since WXS stuff might not be required for conformance, and you don't seem to see any other roadblocks, perhaps we might at some point see XSLT 2.0 implemented in xsltproc ... ? :)

Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard	Thread	RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay
Re: Grouping issue - multiple, Francis Norton	Date	Re: N : M transformation, Tobias Reif
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >