Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0

Play the video

Subject: Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0
From: S Woodside <sbwoodside@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:17:54 -0500

If the goal is to work with WXS, and if the output is garbage (XSLT2.0), then maybe you should consider that the input might have been garbage (WXS). If more people within the W3C would complain about WXS, then maybe something more positive would be done with that spec.

simon

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 04:54 PM, Jim Melton wrote:

The goal of the "group of people" has always been, and still is, to produce a new language that works well in the brave new world of XML Schema-typed documents. If your documents are either purely DTD-based or have no metadata associated with them at all, then the features of XSLT 2.0 that correspond to the XSLT 1.0 specification are all you need use. If you want to deal with Schema-typed documents, then you have more power available.

--
     anti-spam: do not post this address publicly
www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: Re: Re: The Perils of Sud, bryan	Thread	RE: Re: The Perils of Sudden , Américo Albuquerque
Re: Re: The Perils of Sudden , Dimitre Novatchev	Date	entity declaration error, Mac Martine
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >