Cart
|
[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: N : M transformation
 > The semantics of exsl:document aren't identical to those of the > facility implemented in Saxon 6.5.2, and I had already caused > enough confusion with different names and definitions of the > instruction without adding more. Also, I think that by the time it > was specified, I had pretty well frozen the 6.x line except for bug > fixing. I see. I'm looking forward to fully switching to XSLT 2.0 (rec) and Saxon 7.x (stable). Then, among many other benefits, I don't need to decide between a processor-specific extension, an unimplemented EXSLT feature, or the 1.1 draft syntax, or do feature detection, but instead rely on a W3C rec for multi document output. > In 7.x my priority is to implement standard XSLT 2.0 features. Can you estimate the timeframe for XSLT 2.0 to become a recommendation, and for Saxon's implementation of it to become stable? ("production level quality") Tobi -- http://www.pinkjuice.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
