[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma

Subject: Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:54:05 +0100
Re:  is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was:  N : M transforma
Michael Kay wrote:


If the market decides that it wants XSLT processors with schema support
then it will indeed get frustrated with products that don't offer it,
and vendors of those products will come under pressure to provide it.
If, as many people on this list are predicting, users don't care a damn
about having schema support, then they are unlikely to miss it. The
market will decide.


Personally, I think I might find some features related to WXS quite handy. But I find other areas of the current draft much more useful, so I hope that XSLT 2.0 will be widely implemented, with or without schema support.

BTW: Thank you very much for Saxon, including it's experimental support for XSLT 2.0.
It rocks. (as ever :)


Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.