[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transforma
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 06:13 AM, Michael Kay wrote: I'm still of the opinion that the query crowd should take their schema and go find another sandpit to play in, taking the elegant advances of XSLT/XPATH2 as an advance on prior art and available to use as needed for their own purposes. The central point that started this whole debate and now seems to be lost, is that WXS has problems. XMLs roots are in simplifying markup, allowing extensibility, future proofing -- all the good stuff that Simon St. Laurent's always talking about. Now with WXS we have this schema language that's so complicated that even the advanced folks say unabashedly that they don't understand it. I don't understand it, so I use RNG. XQuery decided to align with WXS -- that's collateral damage from WXS. Folks here are saying they want XSLT2 to stay free of the WXS fallout, that seems reasonable. The big vendors may benefit from selling expensive consultants and tools, and they may benefit from devising customized solution systems that modularize the complexity. In the long run, however, I think more people win if the technology is designed such that it can be fully understood by the individuals who use it. simon
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|