[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: OMR Mark for folding machine

Subject: Re: OMR Mark for folding machine
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:44:15 +0100
omr linux
Yates, Danny (ANTS) wrote:
I am guessing now, but I would suggest you need at least 4-8 times as much
memory as the size of your file, especially if using FOP to do page
numbering
and things like this.
It depends. Page numbering in itself is *not* the problem, the problem
are forward references. See FAQ:
 http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#faq-N10139
There are a few more memory leaks not mentioned there, but they should
not occur in reports (well, links may be of some importance: they may
lock large amounts of memory until the page sequence is completely
processed).

I would also suggest the Linux is likely to be more efficient than Windows
(at least it's likely to offer better memory management and have a smaller
footprint).
While Linux has same advantages over Win2K in the areas mentioned,
this does not mean the Linux JDKs are more efficient than their
Windows counterparts. I made some observations which are more favorable
for Windows, but YMMV.

J.Pietschmann


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.