[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: OMR Mark for folding machine
Yates, Danny (ANTS) wrote:
I am guessing now, but I would suggest you need at least 4-8 times as much memory as the size of your file, especially if using FOP to do page numbering and things like this. It depends. Page numbering in itself is *not* the problem, the problem are forward references. See FAQ: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#faq-N10139 There are a few more memory leaks not mentioned there, but they should not occur in reports (well, links may be of some importance: they may lock large amounts of memory until the page sequence is completely processed). I would also suggest the Linux is likely to be more efficient than Windows (at least it's likely to offer better memory management and have a smaller footprint). While Linux has same advantages over Win2K in the areas mentioned, this does not mean the Linux JDKs are more efficient than their Windows counterparts. I made some observations which are more favorable for Windows, but YMMV. J.Pietschmann XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|