Re: N : M transformation

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:47:29PM +0000, David Carlisle wrote:
> In general I'd agree although in the case of xslt I'm not sure how many
> of the current implementors are planning to do an XSLT2. Most have been
> quite quiet on the subject.

The dependancy on W3C XML Schemas makes it very very unlikely for me.
I can't implement a specification I don't understand. As as side
effect I can't implement specifications depending on it too.

   Life is short ... I don't want to bury month and months of
mine into trying to implement (and support !) a spec which is
just too unclear to be understood reliably. At least that's my
perception so far.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list