[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution
> Everything that comes under serialization is a "should" because > serialization itself is optional. yes i understand why html output method is optional, I'm just not sure that it couldn't be more specified in teh cases that teh ssystem choses to support it. > My own view (and the way that XSLT 2.0 may go) is that serialization > should be an optional conformance module, and that most of the things > within it should then be "must"s. sounds good to me. > XSLT 2.0 already has an option to switch off the generation of the > <META> element, on the grounds that users may prefer to do it > themselves. users may say they prefer it, but will they get it right:-) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|