[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The beginning of xslt?

Subject: RE: The beginning of xslt?
From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:27:39 +1100
michael leditschke
Hi Jarkko. This thread from xml-dev might point
you in the right direction in terms of the history of
XSLT.

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200210/msg01610.html

Regards
Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jarkko
> Moilanen
> Sent: Friday, 22 November 2002 6:34 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  The beginning of xslt?
>
>
>
>
> How did the development of xslt begin? Is there a person who said that something
> like this would be needed? I came to this question, while I was doing some
> research about xslt development.
>
> Users	<--------->   xslt language
> ^ ^		    ^	^
> |  \		   /	|
> |   \	__________/	|
> |    \_/______		|
> |     /	      \	  	|
> |    /	       \  	|
> |   /		\	|
> |  /		 \	|
> v v		  v	v
> Processors <---->  xsl-list/w3c
>
> In here the users need the language (arrow between Users and xslt language)
> and also take part in the development of next version (arrow to xsl-list/w3c).
> Also the users get help from the list to their problems in xslt. Users
> need the processors to ecxecute xslt.
>
> Processor developers are restricted (partly) about the language, or to be
> more specific, restricted about the specification. (arrow between Processors and xsl-list)
> Developers offer programs to ecxecute xslt.(arrow between Users and Processors)
>
> Xsl-list/w3c is intrested about the language, ie. specification. Also distributes
> help to users and offers limits and possibilities in the form of spesification.
>
>
> In this framework if the xslt language "disappears", the situation is the
> same as the development of xslt was in the beginning.The situation then also means that there can not
> be any users or processors. So where came the idea about xslt in the beginning, from
> w3c?
>
> If the Processors "disappear", situationis that there can not be any users,
> but the language and xsl-list/w3c can excist.
>
> If there is no xsl-list/w3c, nothing else can excist. (in the framework of xslt)
>
> The main question is still the same:
> where came the idea about xslt in the beginning?
>
> And how did we end up to this situation,as the figure above shows?
>
> Cheers,
> Jarkko
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> Tiedon voi hankkia kolmella tavalla:
> AJATTELEMALLA, se on jalo tapa
> YRITYKSEN JA EREHDYKSEN KAUTTA, se on kova tie
> MATKIMALLA, se on helppo tapa
> 				Konfutse
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Jarkko Moilanen  :) www.uta.fi/~jm60697  =) puh. 040-5112113 :) Smile!!
> ---------------------Cogito ergo sum---------------------------------
> PS. Älä varasta - hallitus vihaa kilpailua!
>
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.