[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper

Subject: Re: fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:13:57 +0100
Re:  fo:inline vs. fo:wrapper
> But if the content of an inline is only pcdata, does the formatter still
> break it David?
> I thought not?

[I know I'm not the David you mean but...] I'd certainly _expect_ them
to be broken. fo:inline is "inline" in the sense that an HTML <em> or a
latex  \textbf{...} is inline, it's used to change some properties of
the text but the result is still part of the main text flow and takes
part in line breaking etc.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.