[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT/XPath 2.0 (was "Identifying two tags...")
David Carlisle wrote: > So what is needed is not conformance levels by which to grade > implementations but "processing modes" by which to control > schema use (or more often useful, non-use). Yes, that makes sense, and such a processing mode could go hand-in-hand with a conformance level. This would allow PSVI-ignorant processors to output an error when it comes across the "psvi-aware" attribute (or whatever) in the stylesheet, rather than simply outputting different results. I agree that this is important and should be heard by the working group. (Of course, when you marry a processing mode with a conformance level, you've essentially got a different version of the language, interesting thought...) However, I think that in practice, a conformance level can still help the potential for multiple interoperable implementations at *any* level. Having multiple implementations that behave the same (which seems far more likely among PSVI-ignorant processors) will certainly impact users in the end. I could have just requested that users send comments requesting that XSLT 2.0 be implementable so that they'll be able to use it, but I figured that was a little on the vague side. Evan Lenz certainly speaking only for himself XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|