Re: XSLT performance under Linux

Daniel,

You wrote a good processor - I had assumed it was C++, but that was a guess.
I'm impressed -- I may even try to write up something in XML Magazine on it,
since I've been casting about for good XSLT processors for a while.

-- Kurt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Veillard" <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:51 PM
Subject: Re:  XSLT performance under Linux


> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:15:02PM -0700, Kurt Cagle wrote:
> > I would recommend working with the xsltproc engine. It's C++ based,
supports
> > a healthy subset of the Saxon parser, and is fast. I had something of a
> > jury-rigged system where I was calling saxon as a jar from the command
line
> > (invoked from an `` expression in perl) and my system was crawling
despite
> > being on a top of the line computer. I replaced it with xsltproc, and it
was
> > a couple of orders of magnitude faster. It should be in most recent
Linux
> > distros, though it's also up on Source Forge.
>
>   Hum, is there another xsltproc out there ? The one I work on is in C
> and hosted at http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ (the CVS base is the one from
> the GNOME project).
>   If it's the same, thanks for your positive review :-)
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
> veillard@xxxxxxxxxx  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list