[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: xsl sorting (Follow-up question)
At 12:24 AM 4/17/2002, you wrote:
> If there is several sorting orders, they are all applied and not > only the last one. For example if there is xml file that includes > severals sets like: > > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="001" id3="001">Juu juu</Subject> > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="002" id3="002">RE:Juu juu</Subject> > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="002" id3="001">RE:Juu juu</Subject> > > and sets are sorted: > <xsl:sort select="Subject/@id" order="ascending" /> > <xsl:sort select="Subject/@id2" order="ascending" /> > <xsl:sort select="Subject/@id3" order="ascending" /> > > So the result would be: > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="001" id3="001">Juu juu</Subject> > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="002" id3="001">RE:Juu juu</Subject> > <Subject id="0000000001" id2="002" id3="002">RE:Juu juu</Subject> > > Right? Right In the case where a sorting key (e.g. the attributes in the above example) is not present, is it possible to specify that absentees should be at the front or at the back of the list? For example, I want to sort a group of items in ascending alphabetical order based on child element "name". Since the name is optional (there may be a series/name and series/number instead of ./name), can I request that any items without a ./name element be at the top of the list, followed by the alphabetical sorting of all items with a ./name element? Conversely, how do I request that they be at the end of the list? (I forget which is the default at the moment.)
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|