[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Q on incremental processing and count()
> My problem is the execution speed. > I have a large table (200 entries) and split them into small tables (per > table 20 entries, every subtable with the same table header). > My problem is: The browser gets the result if all 200 entries are processed in > the memory! Arrrrgggg... > But I expected to see the tables as they come out of the database. > Because for investigating I made it so, that every item needs half a second > to be generated. > I expected to see the first sub table after 20*0.5 seconds, the second table > after 2*20*0.5 seconds and so on. > But actually I see all tables not before 200*0.5 seconds :-( > > If I remove the count() and ...following-sibling... I lost my > table structure but I can see how the values come out as they > were produced. I can't imagine that it's because of complex table structure or HTML rendering. I think it's a problem in the XSL. If you are counting for all the 200 entries all preceding nodes, it will waste much time. Or are you using '//' anywhere? Post the important part of the XSL, maybe we can help you. Regards, Joerg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|