Re: Q on incremental processing and count()

Hi Andrew,
the problem is not the browser, it is the xslt-machine.
May be this is the wrong list for my request and I have to ask
the people how programmed Xalan-j

Regards,
Michael


Andrew Welch wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If you are having problems with slow tables in IE, try using spans and divs
> instead - IE is able to draw these much more quickly.
> 
> For example:
> 
> <table> becomes <div>
> <tr> becomes <div>
> <td> becomes <span>
> 
> You will need to do a little work to sort out the column widths, but that
> will depend on your setup.
> 
> (although, really, a 200 item table shouldnt cause too many problems)
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Enke Michael
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:31 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  Q on incremental processing and count()
> 
> Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> >
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > it's not clear what you want to do. Your variables are ok, no problems to
> > see. You only can shorten them:
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="10"/>
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead/th-row)"/>
> >
> > <xsl:variable name="col-num" select="count(thead[1]/th-row)"/>
> >
> > Between the two last declarations there should be no difference, because
> of
> > your XML.
> >
> > But what exactly is the problem? What's the result you get and you expect?
> > What's the context of the variable declaration?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Joerg
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> My problem is the execution speed.
> I have a large table (200 entries) and split them into small tables (per
> table 20 entries, every subtable with the same table header).
> My problem is: The browser gets the result if all 200 entries are processed
> in
> the memory! Arrrrgggg...
> But I expected to see the tables as they come out of the database.
> Because for investigating I made it so, that every item needs half a second
> to be generated.
> I expected to see the first sub table after 20*0.5 seconds, the second table
> after 2*20*0.5 seconds and so on.
> But actually I see all tables not before 200*0.5 seconds :-(
> 
> If I remove the count() and ...following-sibling... I lost my
> table structure but I can see how the values come out as they
> were produced.
> 
> Regards,
> Michael
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list