[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: The Solution -- Re: how to rearrange nodes bas
> Hmm, I wonder, however, if the notion of node *set* is really > appropriate for most of the use cases here. Why did they not > call it node-sequence? The sequence of stuff is what we're > mostly interested in. Well, instead of wondering about the > specs, I discovered a related problem with your topological > sort. As beautiful as it is, it disturbs document order where > it isn't warranted by the dependencies. For example, let's > say I have 3 cliques of dependent nodes and no link between > them. What happens with top sort is that those three cliques > are all intermingled. The trick is to keep the document sort > order if it doesn't need to be changed. There's another algorithm possible, which traverses "cliques" by "cliques" (I think these are actually called connected components). But it's Christmas time now -- not healthful to work hard during the holidays... To you and all xsl-listers -- My Seasonal Greetings. Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|