[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

A paranoic XPath 2.0 question

Subject: A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:08:33 +0100 (CET)
paranoic

I have noticed that as editors there are listed

4 people from XML Query WG
3 people from XSL WG

If there is some point reised which requires voting, what is the
procedure?

Does it mean that votes are simpli counted.

I am browsing through the spec and have feeling that
XPath went the way of XML Schema:

databases are much more important than text processing


And BTW:

WHERE ARE REGULAR EXPRESSIONS ??????????, which were promissed :

http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20req :
3. Must?Support String Matching Using Regular  Expressions


-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname>   Nic      </surname>

<mail>    nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx    </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.