RE: XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0

Hi David,

I monitor the XPath list for the XSL WG and I have not seen any postings
from you. Please resend your comments and copy me directly so that I can be
sure they get posted.

Thanks.

Zarella Rendon
For the W3C XSL WG
zarella@xxxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David
> Rosenborg
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 5:21 AM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  XPath 2.0 is not XPath 2.0
>
>
> Mike Kay wrote:
>
> > It's good to see comments on the drafts, but please do send
> your reactions
> > to the official feedback address. Some members of both working
> groups read
> > this list but not everyone does; and it's really best if what
> reaches the
> > groups isn't filtered by people like me who will inevitably want to pass
> > some comments on and not others.
>
> Hmm, maybe it's just me, but I think it's pretty strange if not
> every member,
> working actively with XSLT/XPath, monitor this list to at least
> some degree.
>
> (BTW, I sent a copy to the XPath comments address, but it never showed up,
> at least not in the archives, maybe there is some latency and/or moderator
> sitting in between?)
>
> Cheers
>
> </David>
>
> David Rosenborg
> Pantor Engineering AB
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list