[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A paranoic XPath 2.0 question

Subject: Re: A paranoic XPath 2.0 question
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 11:09:59 GMT
download a paranoic
> If there is some point reised which requires voting, what is the
> procedure?

voting in W3C WG's (if it happens at all) is based on the WG membership
not the editorship of the document. Obviously editors have editorial
contrl over th etext but if there is anything contentious enough to
require a vote it should go to the full WG (or I assume in this case to
the full WGs) (This is from my experience being an editor on MathML, I'm
not on XSL WG)

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.