RE: A paranoic XPath 2.0 question

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Michael Kay wrote:


Thanks for your explanations, I have spent last couple of hours browsing
the specs and I have found  quite a few things to my liking (of course not
the breaking of   XPath 1.0 compatibility)

Last few days I have had  quite harsh headaches, which are
unfortunately not
alcohol related, and so I am quite prone to jump to paranoic explanations.

Fortunately, next two weeks I will have better things to do than read
 specifications , but I am looking forward to January
when I will give it some grilling.

-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>
<surname>   Nic      </surname>

<mail>    nicmila@xxxxxxxxxxxx    </mail>
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list