[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: positional predicates in XPath vs XQL
Christopher R. Maden wrote:
Fallacious raciotination obviously.node, <2>. Is my understanding correct?No. Whence did you acquire it? I guess that the confusion comes out of the fact that even though /section/para[ 1 ] is a node set containing nodes 2, 5 and 7, its string "value" is the string value of the first node in this list, i.e. the string value of node 2. Thus, if you display this node set using the XPath string() function or the xsl:value-of XSLT element, you will get the string value of node 2 even though the node set is indeed the list (node 2, node 4, node 5). Eric -- See you in Orlando for XML 2001. http://www.xmlconference.net/xmlusa/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|