[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: reliability of MSXML
> A little strong, I think. David already pointed out that the 1.1 > draft is worded such that to emit a warning would in fact be a > non-conformance. Although I do in fact agree with Daniel that having a widely distributed processor that implements 1.1 rather than 1.0 by default is a real pain. Given the choice, I'd rather have conformance to a rec and non conformance to a withdrawn working draft than the other way round. Having just spent a few hours trying to get a few thousand lines of stylesheet (written by someone else) that was working on saxon to work in MSXML by removing all the hidden 1.1 dependencies, I know how the original poster feels. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|