[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: <no subject>
> 3 what is wrong with this assumtion: if document() returns the root-node > of the referenced document and i copy everything into the tree fragment > of a xsl:variable coerce this afterwards into a node set (msxsl:node-set()) > i'd have rather the same as if i would use an entity instead of the Copying into a variable really does force the processor to copy the entire document tree. (Because the nodes in the copy have to have distinct identities from the nodes in the original) It would be much better to use the original document directly via document() (or equivalently use an empty variable binding and use select= rather than an xsl:choose inside the xsl:variable. It's supposed to work, perhaps if you posted a small example that failed, we'd see what was wrong. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|