[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: XSLT Date

Subject: Re: Re: XSLT Date
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 19:22:25 +0100
xslt date
Hi Joerg,

Joerg Pietschmann wrote:
> 
> >
> I don't quite understand this.
> What i meant was: People have a tendency to put "17. Juni 2001" into
> their XML and expect the XSL (XPath) processor to deal with it. People
> tend to avoid reading specs about stuff they think they already know.
> >From my experience ISO 8601 doesn't seem to be as widely known as i like,
> so there will probably be some moans when they discover that they have to
> use it.
> 
Yes, but if we describe it as "XPath 2.0 accepts understands dates in a
system format" then we run less risk of the moans.

Basically I'm trying to say that I think there is a reasonably
implementable spec that is worth doing, moans and all. Do you think it
would be worth doing this subset or that only something with full
localisation should be done? Or that full localisation is impossible,
and we shouldn't attempt it all? 

Francis.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.