Re: XSL Standards?

Play the video

Subject: Re: XSL Standards?
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 08:36:57 +0100

Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> I think it was just priorities, coupled with insufficient experience in the
> early days of actual user requirements. Extension functions were thought to
> be needed primarily for access to external resources, and to algorithms (e.g
> regexp) which no one would dream of coding in XSLT. Of course that changed
> over time and the requirement to write extension functions in XSLT is now in
> the published XSLT 2.0 requirements.
> 
Thanks - sorry for the extended moan!

Francis.


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: XSL Standards?
- Francis Norton - Mon, 1 Oct 2001 16:44:34 -0400 (EDT)
  - Michael Kay - Mon, 1 Oct 2001 19:01:50 -0400 (EDT)
    - David Carlisle - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 04:24:14 -0400 (EDT)
      - Francis Norton - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:40:38 -0400 (EDT)
    - Francis Norton - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:49:37 -0400 (EDT) <=
  - <Possible follow-ups>
  - Seaborne, Mark - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
  - Patrick Moore - Tue, 2 Oct 2001 16:11:15 -0400 (EDT)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSL Standards?, Francis Norton	Thread	RE: XSL Standards?, Seaborne, Mark
Re: XSL Standards?, Francis Norton	Date	Re: xml-to-xml output does no, Jörg Heinicke
	Month

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Subscribe in XML format

RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >