[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: best way to generate form from xml+schema?

Subject: Re: best way to generate form from xml+schema?
From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:37:25 +0100
generating form from xml
last but not least is one can now use

cold fusion app server, there are now a few cold fusion tags that either
escape to using the well known processors or some custom made solutions.

chow jf
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Seaman" <graham@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: Re:  best way to generate form from xml+schema?


> On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, cutlass wrote:
>
> > Hello Graham,
> >
> > so you are looking for a c++, c, perl server side open source solution.
> >
> > your best bets are
> >
> > a ) AxKit, which uses sablotron ( though dont know where axkit has gone
to
> > these days as i think it is being integrated with Apache possibly ), but
> > sablotron can be used www.gingerall.com
> >
> > b) Saxon comes in , an Instant form at saxon.sourceforge.net
> >
> > c) mod_xslt is a mod extension to Apache
> >
> > all involve a learning curve, within xslt and outside ( especially
setting
> > up mod_perl for use with mod extensions ).
> >
> > in addition u could use the Apache Xalan c++ xslt processor.
> >
> > good luck, jim fuller
> >
> I'm actually using the gnome libxml/libxslt libraries (which have been
> fine so far and quite fast; thanks Daniel!).
> I'm using the Perl XML::LibXML and XML::LibXSLT modules (from Axkit) as
> front ends, called from mod_perl. These seem ok so far.
> I've avoided using the full Axkit, partly because I want to learn how to
> do this stuff for myself, partly because I'm unsure of the current status
> of Axkit given that the website is down.
>
> From what I've seen so far, I'd say this combination is a good addition
> to your list above, and easy to get set up and running (on Unix, anyway).
> Debugging output is a bit limited compared with Xalan (the only other
> XML/XSL processor I've tried), and I believe libxml is slightly less
> strict than Xalan (for example, I've found differences over acceptance of
> multiple charsets in a single xml file: libxml accepts and processes this,
> xalan doesn't).
>
> One thing I haven't tried yet (but will soon) is using extensions: I know
> libxslt supports these, not certain about XML::LibXSLT.
>
> best wishes
> Graham
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.