[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re:

Subject: RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:53:07 +0100
xpath and collection position
> Is it because their authors have difficulties in understanding the
> functional-programming approach?
>
I think most members of both the XSL WG and the XQuery WG would have no
difficulty understanding the approach. I think the objections you would
encounter would be:

(a) will users understand it?
(b) can it be statically type-checked and optimized?
(c) if explicit syntax is good enough for SQL, why isn't it good enough for
XQuery?

Why not put together a position paper arguing the case for higher-order
functions in XPath/XQuery: I'll be happy to bring it to the group's
attention. I'd suggest raising it as a comment on the published draft
XQuery/XPath data model.

Mike Kay



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.