[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re:
> Is it because their authors have difficulties in understanding the > functional-programming approach? > I think most members of both the XSL WG and the XQuery WG would have no difficulty understanding the approach. I think the objections you would encounter would be: (a) will users understand it? (b) can it be statically type-checked and optimized? (c) if explicit syntax is good enough for SQL, why isn't it good enough for XQuery? Why not put together a position paper arguing the case for higher-order functions in XPath/XQuery: I'll be happy to bring it to the group's attention. I'd suggest raising it as a comment on the published draft XQuery/XPath data model. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|