[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: FOO vs FO

Subject: RE: FOO vs FO
From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG)" <bob.ducharme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:47:55 -0400
snee sticker
>See ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3092.txt

Someone had some time on their hands! 

Just last weekend, in a bookstore, I was looking through Microsoft's
documentation style guide, and noticed the explicit prohibition of the use
of "foobar" or its components as being too slangy.

I did pick up a "FOO" bumper sticker (modeled after the 2- and 3-letter oval
stickers so popular in the States, e.g. "VT," "MV," "OBX," etc.) at Linux
World. It's still the only bumper sticker on our car.

I thought that "FOO" vs. "FO" was an interesting question. I'm surprised
more people don't ask why "xsl" is the most common namespace prefix used in
XSLT, but not XSL, for which "fo" is. 

Bob DuCharme            www.snee.com/bob             <bob@  
snee.com>      see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for
info on new book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.