[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators V

Subject: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0
From: cagle@xxxxxxxxx (Kurt Cagle)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 00:30:13 -0700
xpath max from sequence
"Monotonically increasing" has a very precise mathematical definition that
is consistent here, though I would agree with Christ that being able to set
the iterator would be useful.

-- Kurt Cagle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: RE:  XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version
1.0


> Mike,
> What will <xsl:value-of select="1 TO 10" /> give you?
> What will <xsl:copy-of select="1 TO 10" /> give you?
> Will the "," be used as in xf:item-at(($seq1, $seq2), 5) and
> xf:item-at((1 TO 3, 4 TO 6), 5)?
> Will you be able to do <xsl:for-each select="(1 TO 3, 4 TO 6)">
> Why is TO only monotonically increasing?
>
> Ciao Chris
> P.s. Does the word monotonically (11.2.1.3) need to be there? It isn't
> in the online Cambridge dictionary and a quick search of google came up
> with 2 equally scary pages http://atlas-conferences.com/c/a/e/u/38.htm
> http://www.dgp.toronto.edu/people/mooncake/thesis/node87.html ;-)
>
> XML/XSL Portal
> http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Michael Kay
> > Sent: 07 September 2001 23:08
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE:  XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and
> > Operators Version 1.0
> >
> >
> > > > The idea is that a variable which in XPath 1.0 holds a node-set,
> > > > should in XPath 2.0 hold a sequence of nodes, the
> > sequence being in
> > > > document order with no duplicates.
> > >
> > > If a sequence can't contain duplicates what do you get from...
> >
> > A sequence can contain duplicates. But the idea is that (as a first
> > approximation) expressions that in XPath 1.0 return a
> > node-set, will in XPath 2.0 return a sequence in document
> > order without duplicates. New expressions and operators may
> > produce sequences that do contain duplicates.
> >
> > Mike Kay
> >
> >
> >  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >
> >
>
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.