[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

FOO vs FO

Subject: FOO vs FO
From: "Hewko, Doug" <Doug.Hewko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:58:31 -0400
why foo
Does anyone know why FOO was chosen to mean anything?

>From the W3 site, in a message at
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/msg00613.html", someone asked
"What does foo.bar mean in CSS?". The response was:
	
	Ah, a puzzle!

	1. The literal answer is probably not the answer the author is
looking for.

	2. `foo' and `bar' are commonly used as placeholders for arbitrary
character strings.

In XML Bible by E. Harold, page 52, the author says that FOO means "whatever
you want it to". Further down, on page 517, we find that for formatting
objects, the defacto standard prefix is "FO". 

Why was FOO and FO chosen instead of something less confusing? I can
understand FO for formatting objects, but why FOO? Why not XXX or ABC??

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.