RE: RE: XSLT WG: What is planned for XSLT 2.0

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
> If anyone has an idea
> and wants to
> propose a new feature, what should they do?

Any feedback for the XSL WG should be sent to xsl-editors@xxxxxxx This is a
public list with a public archive[1]. I assure you that messages sent to
this list are taken seriously. It is appropriate to send feedback related to
XSLT as well as FO.

Evan Lenz
XYZFind Corp.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dimitre
> Novatchev
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:10 PM
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  RE: XSLT WG: What is planned for XSLT 2.0
>
>
> Do they still accept new user requirements? If anyone has an idea
> and wants to
> propose a new feature, what should they do?
>
> Dimitre Novatchev.
>
> Chris Bayes wrote:
>
> The xslt 2.0 req is at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xslt20req-20010214
> But that was 6 months ago!!!!
> It would be nice to get some feedback from the wg on what is happening.
> If you look at other wgs they are very active on the lists prompting
> feedback and responding to questions about what is happening. Ok there
> is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/ but it doesn't seem
> to cover very much apart from xsl-fo
> What about some feedback guys!
>
> Ciao Chris
>
> XML/XSL Portal
> http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list