[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: l "& #xA0; vs & #160;" version 2 proposal.
>Considering the number of questions this raises, >How many rules would be broken if were added >to an XSLT engine? I.e. put in as part of the rec? > >Regards DaveP If you mean that should be allowed in a stylesheet the same way that & is, then this would be a change to the XML spec. Currently the predefined characters are the bare minimum you need to encode all characters without recourse to a DTD. If you add to this set why not © ™ £ ... Sorry Dave, you will just have to use bigger letters in the FAQ ;-) Regards, Trevor Nash -- Traditional training & distance learning, Consultancy by email Melvaig Software Engineering Limited voice: +44 (0) 1445 771 271 email: tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|