Re: hard core xlt ;-)

okay i understand better, i couldn't image how it
would look like. so yes it's a good idea also, gonna
see what i'm able to do or not :-)

thanks 


--- Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit?: >
Hi Elise,
> 
> > what does it mean summarize ? (sorry i'm french ),
> well i know the
> > word but don't see how it could look like... a
> summer text ?
> 
> I think Francis was talking about grouping the
> results, so for example
> you'd get all the results with a Project Site of
> 'Paris' grouped
> together. If you want a real challenge, try to have
> it so you have
> multi-level grouping with the mix of fields
> determined by the user. So
> for example, they could say:
> 
>   "group by Project Site and Status"
> 
> and you'd get something like:
> 
>   Paris
>     Go
>       Microsoft Visio 10 VS Help    07/04/2001 
> IT0SEO1001
>       Morgan Stanley-Shareholder...            
> IBESEO1107
>     Complete
>       ...
>   London
>     Go
>       ...
>     Complete
>       ...
> 
> or they could say:
> 
>   "group by Status and end date"
> 
> and you'd get something like:
> 
>   Go
>     01/04/2001 - 01/05/2001
>       Microsoft Visio 10 VS Help    07/08/2001 
> IT0SE01001  Paris
>     01/05/2001 - 01/06/2001
>       ...
>     No date
>       Morgan Stanley-Shareholder...            
> IBESE01107  Paris
>   Completed
>     01/04/2001 - 01/05/2001
>       ...
>     01/05/2001 - 01/06/2001
>       ...
> 
> You could also try creating separate frames, one
> holding the table and
> another holding a more detailed description, with
> links between them.
> 
> Allow users to filter according to whether the end
> date is in the past
> or not, or indeed on any parameter they choose.
> 
> Give some summary information, like the number of
> projects in Paris,
> the number with a Status of 'Go'.
> 
> Make the XSLT more generic so that you only have to
> edit a simple XML
> file to change the general look of the page.
> 
> Allow the user to switch between a view when the
> result elements are
> rows and one where they are columns.
> 
> In the table, without grouping (but perhaps with
> sorting), merge the
> cells that contain the same value as their
> neighbours.
> 
> I'm sure that's enough for you to be getting on with
> :)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeni
> 
> ---
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com/
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive: 
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>  

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Vos albums photos en ligne, 
Yahoo! Photos : http://fr.photos.yahoo.com

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list