[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: recursions?
Hi Wendell, > This would work, wouldn't it Jeni? It's kind of a refinement of the > count(ancestor::*) technique. Yep, good point :) (Although if you're doing deep nesting it's probably slightly more efficient to pass down a parameter as you go rather than iterate over all the ancestors of each node.) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|