[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
Is Saxon compatible with the Apache XML Parser (Xerces) or does one need to install a SAXON XML parser too? Rechell Schwartz -----Original Message----- From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:03 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote: > Currently we use XALAN here at work. > > I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most > familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML. Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows. > I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead? I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these special cases) Goetz. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|