Re: ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSL

cutlass wrote:
> 
> so  i would say to those arguing the whole XSLT case ( with respect to
> new requirements )in detail to step back a bit and lookat your user
> requirements, instead of our requirements ( painful as it seems ); xsl
> is in a period of adoption which requires characteristics which are
> commercially viable.

This is ringing a bell...

<quote>On the other hand, if xsl:script is not implemented, XSLT might
stay reserved for an elite and never really take off.</quote>

<quote>How many sites do you think are using XSLT, 0.001%, 0.01%,
0.1%?</quote>

<quote>I would be surprised if this was more than that, and I think we
can say that XSLT **IS** still reserved to an elite and you just have to
listen on the mailing lists to see that people find it hard to start
learning XSLT.</quote>

(http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1092&v=1)

Eric
-- 
See you in Austin (Knowledge Technologies 2001)
              http://www.gca.org/attend/2001_conferences/kt_2001/mon.htm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       Dyomedea                    http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org         http://4xt.org              http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list