[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer of
Steve, Thank you for your continued conversation. On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Steve Muench wrote: > I don't understand how the "URI-to-ResourceContainingXBindModule" > binding takes place. How does the processor "hook up" with > its XBindModule definition? From where does it fetch it the > first time? Does it periodically ping for updates? I listed several levels of "hook-up" in the e-mail, you neglected to discuss the first few: (1) build-in, (2) local-catalogue, (3) stylesheet-provided, (4) ask-the-user, and instead focused only on the RDDL based binding mechanism, which I refer you to the RDDL discussion for more detail. > This, I believe, is a red herring. URI's are URI's. Where in the xsl:script spec is a URI provided to identify the functionality described? There is a prefix, and this is not a global URI. Also there is a "src", and this is not a language independent URI and must be missing when the script code is included in the stylesheet. So, What am I missing? Where is this implementation-independent-uri in the 1.1 Draft? > The prefix referenced by <xsl:script implements-prefix="foo"> > would be assigned to this globally-unique namespace URI > at the top of the stylesheet or directly on the <xsl:script> > element itself, depending on the developer's preference. I think you are digging here. This URI is for the prefix, not for the module, and in the example it says "uri.any". This is hardly a uri representing the functionalty provided. > I think that your saying that a hastily-selected, > for-all-intents-and-purposes-temporary URI used > with <xsl:script> is different from a responsibly-selected > URI used with the xbind. Which I agree with. However, > both can be used with responsibly-selected namespace URI's. Ok. So you are saying, given <stylesheet xmlns:prfix="my-unique-uri-identifying-functionality" > <script implements-prefix="prfix" language="java" src="..." /> ... A processor, could use the resoultion I put forth earlier, for "my-unique-uri-identifying-functionality" without even using the "script" Could I even remove "script" altoghether then? And make the "script" binding stuff _seperate_ from XSLT in with it's own registry/biding mechanism? Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|