Re: Functional programming in XSLT

> Jeni Tennison wrote:
> 
> > That's one vote for exsl:result (Uche) and one vote for exsl:return
> > (you).  Any other opinions?
> 
> Is it doing something or being something? Is it to be viewed as an
> instruction to the processor to perform a return, or as a statement that
> at this point we are seeing some value? If that decision is impossible
> or the answer ambiguous, ummm ... avoid the issue: "exsl:return-value"
> could be read as imperative by those who want imperative and as nominal
> by those who want nominal :-)

I actually like this dodge.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list