[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
Scott_Boag@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > That is my point about it being a stop-gap measure -- it will be a while > until XSLT is a general purpose transformation language. Maybe it will > never be. Good design takes time, and is interlocked with other standards. > It's better for us to limit the ability of XSLT while we develop good > designs for things like the document() function, grouping, etc. Extensions > also allow vendors and users to prototype ideas, and then have the WG learn > from them. > Scott, does this mean you would favour XSLT extensions in XSLT (<saxon:function> style) in order to allow "vendors and users to prototype ideas", or resist it because it would go too far towards making XSLT "a general purpose transformation language"? Francis. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|