Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: RE: syntax su

> Hi Jeni,
> 
> > I think the upshot of this is that unless we introduce a proper
> > construct like (test ? true : false) that only evaluates the relevant
> > expression, we *have* to enable xsl:if/xsl:choose to be specified
> > within function declarations. An exsl:if() function will not be
> > sufficient.
> 
> That's correct.

Well, I definitely think an exsl:ternary() extension function should be on our 
list to consider.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com 
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list