[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XSLT 1.1 comments
Steve Muench wrote: > Of course, the ability to *avoid* using XSLT extension functions > remains exactly as in XSLT 1.1. So, for ultimately portability > there is no change at all: simply avoid extension functions. > This situation has surely not be made more complicated by XSLT 1.1. > However, the lives of developers combining XSLT with ECMAScript > and Java extensions *has* improved because now even if they *do* > use extension functions, their stylesheets can still be portable > across implementations that implement extension function language. I can't see that Steve. I write a chunk of VB or C# as script within my stylesheet, ship it to Sebastian (no M$ kit), and apart from him throwing up, he can't run it. It seems like a request to Mike Kay to have to pick up all sorts of new language links etc. for Saxon? -1 from me. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|